| |
A Summary of:
Detection of IgG and IgM to West Nile Virus
First a little essential vocabulary.
Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) are two classes of antibodies
found in the circulatory fluids. IgG is the most common class of antibodies,
while IgM is built from five IgG monomers. Both of these immunological responses
can be triggered by viruses and other foreign material. These antibodies
are often specific to a certain pathogen, and IgM is usually much more specific
than IgG.
How can we tell that IgG and IgM are present in a Serum Sample?
Typically, there are a number of assays that can be used to identify IgM and
IgG in the body’s serums. A method that has been commonly used is the
ELISA method, or the Enzyme-Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay. This technique
takes an antibody (or the antigen), and links it to an enzyme that can be
measured by certain analytic methods. The particular technique, which captures
the antibody, is referred to as MAC-ELISA.
Another type of detection is immunoflourescence assay (IFA), which depends
upon a chemical linkage between an antibody (or the antigen) and a fluorescent
molecule. The fluorescent molecule (a fluorochrome) will fluoresce only after
this linkage has been established.
Why did they do this research?
Rapid detection of West Nile Virus in a population is important for both treatment
of the disease, as well as detection and movement of the virus in a geographic
area. The research reviewed in the following paragraphs was performed in order
to examine the techniques, which typically are used to identify West Nile Virus.
This paper focused on methods of secondary detection of the virus. In other
words the authors examined ways of detecting responses to a particular antibody,
instead of detecting the actual virus. The authors compared two types of analyses
to a new type, which they developed.
Detection of an antibody to this virus was formerly conducted using either
ELISA or MAC-ELISA techniques. These techniques require a constant supply of
the actual antigen, which is not usually available in the case of West Nile
Virus. The authors developed an IFA technique, which relied on similar serum
collections and detection of the same antibodies. The IFA technique does not
require a supply of the antigen, so may be more cost effective and practical
for many institutions.
|